Legal Opinion

Wijesekera (Royce) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2015No. 66895Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

to include the sentence enhancements, see NRS 173.095 (providing that an information may be amended at any time before the verdict or finding "if no additional or different offense is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced"); Phipps v. State, 111 Nev. 1276, 1279,

903 P.2d 820, 822

(1995) (observing that oral amendments to a complaint or information are permissible "where they are detailed and specific and are eventually memorialized"). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. J. Pal-raguirre r----7\-e--14,4 Douglas cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phipps v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API