People v. Tenner
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PANELLI, J.
We granted review in this case to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeal on the question whether an abstract of judgment and a state prison commitment form, considered in light of the unrebutted presumption that an official duty is regularly performed (Evid. Code, § 664), constitute sufficient evidence to support a finding that a defendant completed a prior prison term for purposes of imposing the one-year enhancement provided in Penal Code section 667.5. We conclude that this evidence suffices to prove the defendant completed a prior prison term. Accordingly, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Martin v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Curl v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- People v. MongeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. DelgadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Hobbs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.