Hobbs v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Saitta, J.:
In this appeal, we consider two primary issues. We first address whether spitting on another constitutes a battery under NRS 200.481. We hold that it does. Next, we consider whether the State sufficiently established the requisite prior domestic battery misdemeanor convictions to enhance appellant Timothy Lee Hobbs’ current offense to a felony. We hold that it did not. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of conviction, and we remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Patricia…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. PinholsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- GONZALES (MELVIN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Robert Leeds v. Perry RussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Truesdell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- George J. v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.