Legal Opinion

In re Estate of James

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1893No. 15152PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order refusing to revoke and grant letters of administration. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.'

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

This proceeding was commenced in the superior court of Santa Cruz County under the provisions of section 1383 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the petitioner therein, Sarah M. James, appeals from an order of that court refusing to revoke letters of administration theretofore issued to the respondent, Leonora A. James, upon the estate of William E. James, deceased, and also refusing to grant letters of administration upon the said estate to the petitioner.

The petitioner and the respondent each claims to be the widow of the deceased, and these conflicting claims present the general question…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Starbuck v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Grover & Baker Sewing MacHine Co. v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Cheely v. ClaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Head v. DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API