Brush v. Smith
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.—
This action was brought to recover the possession of certain cattle described in the complaint, or the value thereof in case a delivery cannot be had. The case was tried before the court and findings filed, upon which judgment was ordered and entered for plaintiff. Defendants prosecute this appeal from the judgment and an order denying their motion for a new trial. The facts are as follows: In September, 1899, defendant King commenced an action against the plaintiff in the justice court of Santa Rosa Township to recover the sum of $299.99, besides interest. The complaint in said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- North Pacific Cycle Co. v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Dryden v. ParrotteNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Crane v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- O'Donnell v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.