Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1928No. Docket No. 3564PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendants from an order of the trial court refusing to vacate a default judgment and also an appeal from the judgment.

On October 29, 1919, the defendants, for value received, made, executed, and delivered to one W. J. Knapp their promissory note for the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars, due one year after date, with interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum, and secured by an assignment of whatever interest defendant had “as heir at law or legatee in the estate of Adam Ott, deceased.” The note was not paid, and on October 29, 1924,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. King Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Waite v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Nicoll v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Savage v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Devlin v. Kearny Mesa AMC/Jeep/Renault, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Searcy v. Hemet Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Howard Greer Custom Originals v. CaprittiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Cook v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API