Legal Opinion

Filtration Development Co., LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 3, 2004No. 03-2835CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This post-award bid protest case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. From the onset, defendant argued that the court need look no further than to principles of justiciability to resolve this controversy. The issues raised within are of paramount importance, as they concern not only the next rotation of military equipment which is scheduled to arrive in Iraq in the spring of 2004, but also because they define the parameters in which the military may exercise its discretion in invoking the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Filtration Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Chapman Law Firm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. PMTech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Filtration Development Co., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API