Legal Opinion

PHT Supply Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 26, 2006No. 05-1312 CPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

Plaintiff PHT Supply Corporation (PHT) filed its post-award bid protest complaint on December 16, 2005. The administrative record (AR) was filed on January 19, 2006. Now pending before the court are plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record, filed January 24, 2006, and cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record filed by defendant the United States (United States) and intervenor-defendant Airtronic Services, Inc. (Airtronic) on February 8, 2006. The motions have been fully briefed. PHT filed a response to the motions by defendant and…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. NEQ, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. D & S Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Career Training Concepts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Idea International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API