Legal Opinion
Chapman Law Firm v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 25, 2005No. 04-1681 CPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is the post-award bid protest of Chapman Law Firm Company, LPA (Chapman). Chapman alleges that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) breached the implied contract of fair dealing in connection with this procurement and awarded the contract to Harrington, Moran Barksdale, Inc. (HMBI) in violation of the terms of the Request for Proposals. Complaint (Compl.) at 1. Chapman seeks injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) and Rule 65 of the Court of Federal Claims and legal relief under 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Galen Medical Associates, Inc. v. United States, and Deborah Downing Md, PllcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- OTI America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Precision Standard, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Metropolitan Van & Storage, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.