Legal Opinion
PMTech, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 20, 2010No. 10-458 CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
Now pending before the court are the parties’ cross motions for judgment on the administrative record, which have been fully briefed and are ripe for a decision by the court. Although the parties’ motions were not captioned as such, the court believes that the motions are most appropriately treated as cross motions for judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 52.1(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Plaintiff PMTech, Inc. (PMTech) challenges defendant’s decision to override an automatic stay of the performance of a task order…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Dyncorp International LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- URS Federal Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- At & T Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- URS Federal Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.