Legal Opinion
Hyduke v. Grant
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1984No. C9-83-2019PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Michael Hyduke brought this action against attorney David Grant and Grant’s firm, Broeker, Hartfeldt, Hedges & Grant, alleging legal malpractice. The defendants counterclaimed for unpaid legal fees. After the district court granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment on the malpractice claim and their counterclaim, Hyduke appealed. We affirm.
FACTS
Beginning in August, 1975, Grant and his firm (“lawyers”) represented appellant in a wrongful discharge action against his former employer, where he had been employed as a “corporate communicator.” At the close of that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Millhouse v. WiesenthalTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Floyd v. KoskoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Millhouse v. Wiesenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.