Legal Opinion

Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & Dickson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2000No. 990185PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dan Nelson Construction, Inc., Dan Nelson Construction and Dan Nelson (“Nelson”) appealed from a summary judgment dismissing Nelson’s legal malpractice action against Nodland & Dickson, a partnership, and Irvin B. Nodland, P.C., doing business as Nodland Law Offices (“Nod-land”). We conclude the trial court correctly ruled Nodland’s alleged negligent act was not, as a matter of law, the proximate cause of any of Nelson’s damages. We affirm.

I

[IT' 2] Nelson, the owner of a Beach, North Dakota-based earth-moving company, was the successful bidder on a Wyoming state project…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc./Franki Foundation Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  4. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Spirit Leveling Contractors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Overboe v. Farm Credit Services of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Leet v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jones v. BarnettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API