Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Kosko

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 25, 1985No. 0451PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Jesse J. Floyd sued his personal attorney, respondent George C. Kosko, for breach of contract, negligence and professional malpractice. The trial court granted Kosko’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

This is a companion case to Floyd v. McFadden, 327 S. E. (2d) 73 (S. C. 1985). Floyd was sued in 1976 by the survivors of Nancy J. Stewart in a medical malpractice action. He forwarded the suit papers to both Kosko and his malpractice insurance carrier’s attorney, J. Means McFadden. The Stewart suit was commenced in the wrong court. After a conversation between McFadden and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. John Burk, P.C. v. BurzynskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Stewart Ex Rel. Estate of Stewart v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Graham v. Town of LorisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Perkins v. SykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Millhouse v. WiesenthalTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Manning v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Hall v. FedorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API