State v. Ortiz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge
On appeal from a pretrial order dismissing a first-degree assault count for lack of probable cause, the state argues that the district court erred by requiring the state to establish probable cause by evidence that would be admissible at trial and by rejecting the state’s theory that, under the circumstances, respondent’s use of his fists could constitute “deadly force.”
FACTS
On August 3, 2000, officers of the Albert Lea Police Department were dispatched to the jail area of the law enforcement center in Albert Lea (the jail) where an assault had allegedly occurred.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. KnochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. EnochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. GerardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. BernardiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004