State v. Enoch
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Judge.
In these consolidated cases, Laura Josephine Enoch and Jeri Ann Watson were charged separately with fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. Enoch and Watson jointly moved to dismiss their cases for lack of probable cause on the ground that the state had evidence only of a field test, but not of a confirmatory test, to prove that the substances seized from them are, in fact, methamphetamine. After an eviden-tiary hearing, the district court denied the joint motion to dismiss. At Enoch’s and Watson’s request, the district court then certified…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re UnitedHealth Group Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. LariveeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ArendsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. KnochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010