Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Morris

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1990No. C8-88-2614PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

By this action respondent Jon Johnson seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violation of his federal civil rights by three law enforcement officers. 1 Additionally, he seeks damages on various state tort claims. The three officers and their governmental employers were originally named as defendants. 2 Following discovery the trial court eventually granted summary judgment on both Johnson’s federal and state tort claims to the six named defendants. On appeal, summary judgment in favor of all defendants except Van Hal was affirmed; but the summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Charles Waters v. B. MadsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. Baribeau v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  4. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API