Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 28, 1983No. 82-255PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, appeals from adverse rulings by the Superior Court (Cann, J.) concerning the interpretation to be given provisions in one of its automobile liability policies and the applicability of declaratory judgment procedures to situations involving first-party claims; i.e., claims between the insured and the insurer not involving liability to a third party. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
*150The plaintiffs, Kenneth W. and Rachel Andrews, filed a petition for declaratory judgment (RSA 491:22) seeking a judicial interpretation of the uninsured…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Mannheimer Bros. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Grimes v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Town of Epping v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mostow v. State Farm Ins. Cos.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., Inc. v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Sloan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Asmussen v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.