Phillips v. Phillips
California Supreme Court
APPEALS by the defendant from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial, and appeals by the plaintiff from portions of such judgments. Walter Bordwell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gibson, Trask, Dunn & Crutcher, and Edward E. Bacon, for Plaintiff, Appellant in No. 2774 and Respondent in No. 2764. J. W. McKinley, and W. R. Millar, for Defendant, Respondent in No. 2774 and Appellant in No. 2764.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
These are actions to foreclose two certain mortgages. Judgments in favor of the plaintiff were rendered in the trial court, but the court declined to include in said judgments a certain amount claimed on account of advances made by plaintiff for taxes, street assessments, insurance, and the like due upon the mortgaged premises. Defendant’s appeal is from the judgments and from an order denying her motion for a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from that part of the judgments which is unfavorable to his claim for advances.
The whole controversy with respect to defendant’s appeal has reference to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Loan & Trust Co. v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Ballard v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Quanchi v. Ben Lomond Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Orella v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Rapp v. RappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Kelley-Clarke Co. v. LeslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Chain v. EhrmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.