Legal Opinion

Rapp v. Rapp

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14707PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

On May 1, 1924, the plaintiff and defendant, who were then husband and wife, entered into a written agreement for the settlement of their property rights. Among other things, the written agreement provides “that said second party [Iljalmar Rapp, plaintiff herein] does hereby accept and receive from first party [Edith W. Rapp, defendant herein] in full settlement of his right, title, interest, claim or demand in and to said property, community or separate, and whether the same consists of real property, money or other securities, the sum of Seven thousand four hundred ($7,400) dollars, payable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perry v. MagnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Foley v. EulessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Roper v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Quanchi v. Ben Lomond Wine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. ScheuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Benner v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Adams v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Peterson v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API