Legal Opinion
Kelley-Clarke Co. v. Leslie
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 5, 1923No. Civ. No. 4471PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.
Action for damages for breach of contract for the purchase of pineapple. Appeal by defendants from a judgment, after verdict, in favor of plaintiff, in the sum of $2,650.80. Plaintiff is a firm of brokers and manufacturers’ agents with offices in San Francisco, and defendants have their place of business in Chicago.
The contract is evidenced by telegrams exchanged between F. A. Davis, a S'an Francisco broker, agent for plaintiff, and the Continental Brokerage Company in Chicago, acting for defendants. These telegrams show:(1) An offer on July 15, 1920, by Davis, to Continental Brokerage…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yolo Water & Power Co. v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Ralphs v. HenslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ballard v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ford v. Lou Kum ShuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Edquest v. Tripp & Dragstedt Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Blair v. Guarantee Title Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Earl Fruit Co. v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- McGrew Machine Co. v. One Spring Alarm Clock Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.