Legal Opinion

Carrington v. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF DURHAM

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 8110IC94PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The question brought forward in this appeal is whether the Commission’s findings of fact upon which plaintiffs' award was based are supported by competent evidence. In an appeal from the Industrial Commission, our scope of review is limited. The Industrial Commission’s findings of fact are binding on us if supported by competent evidence. Perry v. Furniture Co., 296 N.C. 88, 249 S.E. 2d 397 (1978). The Commission’s findings of fact may be set aside on appeal only when there is a complete lack of competent evidence to support them. Click v. Freight Carriers, 300 N.C. 164, 265 S.E.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Perry v. Hibriten Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Davis v. Sanford Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Weidle v. Cloverdale FordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Thomas & HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Hill v. Hanes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Blackwell v. Multi Foods Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Locklear v. Canal Wood Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. In re L.D.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API