Legal Opinion

Weidle v. Cloverdale Ford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1981No. 8010IC581PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

In Lawrence v. Mill, 265 N.C. 329, 330-331, 144 S.E.2d 3, 4 (1965), the North Carolina Supreme Court, per Justice Higgins, stated:

In compensation cases the Commission finds the facts. If the findings have evidentiary support in the record, they are conclusive. However, the question whether the evidence is sufficient to support the findings is one of law to be determined by the courts.

We thus review the evidence here solely to determine its sufficiency to support the findings on which plaintiffs award is based.

The totality of the evidence in this record is the testimony of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lawrence v. Hatch MillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SweatDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  2. Carrington v. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF DURHAMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Locklear v. Canal Wood Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. In re L.D.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API