Blackwell v. Multi Foods Management, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Defendants contend that the Industrial Commission committed error in concluding that plaintiff has a “serious bodily disfigurement” pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-31(22) (1987) and is entitled to compensation.
Defendants assign error to the following findings of fact enumerated in the Opinion and Award of the Full Commission:
5. The injury causes plaintiff pain and discomfort. In order to relieve his discomfort, the plaintiff must periodically remove his footwear in order to rub the scarred area while at work. The plaintiff experiences discomfort to his foot when the foot is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Stanley v. Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Davis v. Sanford Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Liles v. Charles Lee Byrd Logging Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Divine v. Department of TransportationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2000
- Divine v. N.C. Department of TransportationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2000
- Little v. Duke University Medical CenterNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
- Price v. PalaceNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2009