Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Electrical District Number Four

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1930No. Civil No. 3034PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an action by H. J. Ramirez to enjoin Electrical District No. 4 and its board of directors from consummating a sale of $250,000 in improvement bonds of the district to defendant K. G. Seargent. The case was heard upon the pleadings and a stipulation of facts. Judgment was entered for defendants and plaintiff appeals.

The Electrical District was organized November 5, 1929, under the provisions of article 3, chapter 81 (sections 3431-3466), Revised Code of 1928, or what is commonly referred to as the Electrical Irrigation District Act.

A proposed bond issue of $334,000 was regularly voted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Columbia Irrigation District v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Day v. Buckeye Water Conservation & Drainage DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Board of Directors v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Colburn v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Bugbee v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State of Arizona v. Yuma Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Rutledge v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Pinetop-Lakeside Sanitary District v. FergusonArizona Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API