Legal Opinion

Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La Prade

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1935No. Civil No. 3588PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

This is an original proceeding by Maricopa County Municipal Water Conserva tion District No. 1, an irrigation district organized under chapter 149, Session Laws of Arizona 1921, hereinafter called the district, asking for a writ of mandamus against Arthur T. La Prade, as Attorney General of the state of Arizona, hereinafter called defendant, directing him to certify certain contracts in the manner set' forth in chapter 6 of the Third Special Session of the Eleventh Legislature, hereinafter called the act.

Defendant has demurred generally to the complaint on the ground that it does not state a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. United States Ex Rel. Ness v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Board of Barber Examiners v. WalkerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. PhelpsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Board of Regents v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Koelling v. Board of Trustees of Mary Frances Skiff Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API