Legal Opinion
Postemski v. Watrous
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 5, 1963PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiff sued to recover damages for an alleged breach of a covenant against encumbrances contained in a deed of real estate executed by the defendant. The trial court found for the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed.
The case was presented to the trial court on a stipulation of facts which has not been made a part of the record. Since no oral evidence was presented, no finding of subordinate facts was necessary, and ordinarily none would be proper. Sheldon House Club, Inc. v. Branford, 149 Conn. 28, 30, 175 A.2d 186. The court in fact made no finding. The defendant has filed a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Spitzer v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Mendrochowicz v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Anderson v. ArgravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Hirsch v. ThrallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- DiCostanzo v. TripodiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Charlton Press, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Wooster v. Wm. C. A. Fischer Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Second Exeter Corp. v. EpsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Larke v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.