Legal Opinion
Second Exeter Corp. v. Epstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 22, 1985No. 3789PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
This appeal arises out of the trial court’s judgment for the defendants in an action for money due on a lease of telephone equipment. The trial court held that the plaintiff, as collection agent for the lessor, First National Bank of Boston, did not have standing to sue the defendants in its own name. We agree.
Paragraph one of the plaintiff’s revised complaint alleged that: “The plaintiff, Second Exeter Corporation, is a Massachusetts corporation authorized to do *428business in the State of Connecticut, and is the lawful collection agent for the First National Bank of Boston and is acting in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Palmer v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Leonard v. BailwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Postemski v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Ruda v. McKinstrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fuller v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. FequiereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Canton Motorcar Works, Inc. v. DiMartinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Schwarz v. Waterbury Public Market, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Mall v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.