Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Argraves
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 7, 1959PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.
The plaintiffs brought this action against the state highway commissioner to recover for damage alleged to have been occasioned to their respective properties. They averred in their substituted complaint as amended, hereinafter referred to as the complaint, that “the defendant was in control of a certain culvert and embankment over the West Branch of the Shepaug River and under a part of the main State Highway, known as Route #25”; that the “culvert and embankment were erected and maintained by the defendant and his predecessors, for the purpose of directing, controlling and diverting the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anselmo v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Somers v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Munson v. MacDonald, Highway CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Scranton v. L. G. DeFelice & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
3Cited by23 opinions
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Fetterman v. University of ConnecticutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Textron, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Murphy v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.