DiCostanzo v. Tripodi

This was a suit for rent. The plaintiff had judgment and he appealed. He has abandoned the claim that the court erred in denying his motions for a new trial. The finding is not attacked.

For a long time prior to September, 1948, the de fendarits occupied a store owned by the plaintiff in Stamford as month-to-month tenants at a rental of $75 per month, due and payable on the first day of each month. In May, 1948, the defendants informed the plaintiff that they would vacate by September 1, 1948. The plaintiff arranged for a tenancy commencing on that date, and his son took a week off from work…