Legal Opinion
Hirsch v. Thrall
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 21, 1961PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment for the plaintiffs in an action alleging negligence in the operation of a school bus owned by him and operated by his agent in the course of his employment. The defendant assigns error in the subordinate facts found by the court, in the court’s conclusions, and in the overruling of his claims of law.
The facts found by the court relating to the way in which the plaintiffs sustained their injuries can be stated briefly as follows: On March 27, 1958, about 4 o’clock in the afternoon, the plaintiff Jane D. Fretard, who sues to recover damages for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kanopka v. KanopkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- City of Bridgeport v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Murphy v. DantowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Bochicchio v. PetrocelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Cantonbury Heights Condominium Ass'n v. Local Land Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Piantedosi v. FloridiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.