Legal Opinion

Potts v. Heil-Quaker Corporation

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DYER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal in a workmen’s compensation case by James Vernon Potts (employee) from the holding of the chancellor that the injury received by the employee did not arise out of or in the course of his employment. The issue here is whether the injury was “in the course of employment” or more specifically, whether the “place” of the injury was “in the course of employment.”

The facts on the determinative issue are as follows: Employee, male, age 47, had been employed by Heil-Quaker Corporation (employer), for a number of years as a welder. The premises of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Little v. Johnson City Foundry & MacHine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bennett v. Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Moore v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. McKinney v. Hardwick Clothes, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Mallette v. Mercury Outboard Supply CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Holder v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Lovell v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County Ex Rel. Nashville Electric ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Frazier v. Normak InternationalTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API