Legal Opinion

Strader v. United Family Life Insurance Company

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1966PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chattin

Leola Strader, complainant in the trial court, filed this suit for benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The defendants, United Family Life Insurance Company and its insurance carrier, defended on the ground the suit was barred by the statute of limitations of one year. The Chancellor sustained the plea and dismissed complainant’s bill.

Complainant did not file a motion for a new trial, but prayed .and was granted an appeal to this Court.

The defendants have filed in this Court a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground complainant failed to file a motion for a new trial in the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Atlas Powder Company v. LeisterTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Shubert v. SteelmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mashburn v. Ne-Hi Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hyter v. Wheland Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davis v. Gulf Insurance GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jenkins v. Loudon CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Wooten Transports, Inc. v. HunterTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Agus v. Future Chattanooga Development CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1973
  5. American City Bank of Tullahoma v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API