Legal Opinion

P.B. Bell & Associates v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 13, 1984No. 1 CA-IC 3139PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OGG, Judge.

The issue presented in this special action review of an Industrial Commission award is whether claimant’s injury arose out of or in the course of her employment. We hold that the administrative law judge correctly concluded that it did and affirm the award.

The necessary facts are relatively simple and not in dispute. Respondent employee Jean Sandrone (claimant) was employed as an accounts payable clerk by petitioner employer P.B. Bell & Associates (Bell). Claimant did not drive to work but was dropped off by her daughter at the front of the building.

Bell was one of several…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Frishkorn v. FlowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Max E. Landry, Inc. v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MGM MIRAGE v. CottonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Zoucha v. Touch of Class LoungeNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Connors v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. RobertsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Jackson Purchase Medical Associates v. CrossettKentucky Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API