Paul Dinto Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The sole issue in this appeal1 is whether a corporation’s motor vehicles are properly assessed *708for personal property taxes in the town in which the corporation maintains its principal place of business, or in the towns in which the vehicles are actually located, that is, where they are regularly parked or garaged. The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The effect of this judgment was that the vehicles properly would be assessed in the towns where…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. PiorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- City of New Haven v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Genesky v. Town of East LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.