Legal Opinion
Genesky v. Town of East Lyme
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 30, 2005No. SC 17152PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Edward Genesky, is a regular member of a paid municipal police department for purposes of receiving benefits under the Heart and Hyper*248tension Act, General Statutes § 7-433C.1 The plaintiff, a constable employed by the defendant, the town of East Lyme (town), appeals from the decision of the compensation review board (board), which affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the eighth district2 (commissioner) dismissing his claim for benefits under § 7-433c on the ground that he was not a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Oxford Tire Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Board of Police Commissioners v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Stitzer v. Rinaldi's RestaurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Vincent v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Provencher v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Canty v. OttoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.