Legal Opinion
State v. Piorkowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 19, 1996No. 15259PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the defendant’s conditional plea of nolo contendere in the trial court, to the crime of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a),1 presents an appropriate occasion for appellate review of his substantive claims pursuant to Practice Book § 4003 (b).2 *391The defendant, Michael Piorkowski, appeals3 from the judgment of the Appellate Court which declined to review his claims regarding the admissibility of certain statements that he had made to the police,4 and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. State v.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. ComminsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.