Harms v. Godinez
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PLUNKETT, District Judge.
Following an incident on January 30, 1992, an Adjustment Committee of the Stateville Correctional Center found inmate Michael Harms guilty of violating Illinois Department of Corrections rules. Mr. Harms contests this finding on the grounds that there was no evidence that he violated the rules. For the reasons stated below, we grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss the Complaint with prejudice.
Background
On January 30,1992, Harms and five other inmates were working at the commissary at the Stateville Correctional Facility.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Cardenas v. WigenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Lasley v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Geder v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Wilson v. SchomigDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.