Legal Opinion

Harms v. Godinez

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 29, 1993No. 92 C 3168PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PLUNKETT, District Judge.

Following an incident on January 30, 1992, an Adjustment Committee of the Stateville Correctional Center found inmate Michael Harms guilty of violating Illinois Department of Corrections rules. Mr. Harms contests this finding on the grounds that there was no evidence that he violated the rules. For the reasons stated below, we grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss the Complaint with prejudice.

Background

On January 30,1992, Harms and five other inmates were working at the commissary at the Stateville Correctional Facility.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Cardenas v. WigenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Lasley v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. Geder v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  5. Wilson v. SchomigDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API