Legal Opinion

Geder v. Godinez

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 28, 1995No. 92 C 2100PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Prison inmate Selma Geder brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, contending that several prison officials violated his constitutional rights. Defendants now move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, their motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Facts

Selma Geder (“Mr. Geder”), proceeding pro se, is incarcerated at the Stateville Correctional Center (“Stateville”) in Joliet, Illinois. Defendants are the following employees of the Illinois Department of Corrections at Stateville: Warden…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Warden of the Stateville Correctional CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. Roop v. SquadritoDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  3. Talbert v. HinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  4. Perales v. BowlinDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
  5. Chapple, Jr. v. Unknown OfficersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API