Legal Opinion
Cardenas v. Wigen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 8, 1996No. Civil Action 95-3917, 95-3500 and 95-3202PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Petitioners, Jose Labrador Cardenas, Arquimedes Perez and Adolfo R. Martinez are federal prisoners. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, 1 they have each individually filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioners’ claims stem from disciplinary action taken against them after contraband was found in the dormitory unit shared by Petitioners and nine other inmates. In their petitions, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Perez and Mr. Martinez allege violations of their constitutional and civil rights as well as violations of prison regulations. Specifically, each…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sanford v. ManternachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Johnson v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Marksberry v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
- Butler v. Oak Creek-Franklin School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- Nwanze v. HahnDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.