Legal Opinion

Lasley v. Godinez

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 24, 1993No. 92 C 4444PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs, inmates at Stateville Correctional Center, bring this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against ten correctional officials at Stateville. Plaintiffs allege that their due process rights have been violated because they have been found guilty at Adjustment Committee hearings without any evidence to support the finding, that defendants have failed to follow procedures of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC”), and that Warden Godinez, Assistant Warden Schomig, and Superintendent Nelson have failed to supervise their…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Romero v. O'SULLIVANAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Cardenas v. WigenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Smith v. FarleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  4. Allnew v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  5. Thompson v. HawkDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API