Legal Opinion

STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BY THE SPECIAL COMPENSATION FUND v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1997No. C2-96-757PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon ail the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. and George L. Wintz for farther review of a decision of the court of appeals filed November 26, 1996 be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of reducing the $1,019,220 penalty to $317,064, the reasonable market cost of insurance without any deductions, leaving the $200,000 “pure” penalty in place, making the total penalty due $517,064. While it may be, as petitioners suggest, that the penalty provision is essentially punitive, thereby requiring a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Director, Bureau of Workers’ Disability Compensation v. Bmc Manufacturing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Davies v. West Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Broehm v. Mayo Clinic RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Wenigar v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Szarzynski v. SzarzynskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API