Legal Opinion
Wenigar v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 2006No. A05-158, A05-473PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
R.A. RANDALL, Judge.
Respondent Lester Wenigar brought an action against appellant Lee Johnson, his former employer, asserting violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), disability discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), violations of Minn.Stat. §§ 181.13, 181.79, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court found Johnson liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress and for violations of the MHRA and the FLSA. The court later denied Johnson’s new trial motion and partially granted Wenigar’s petition for an award of attorney…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Williams v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Onyiah v. St. Cloud State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Friend v. Gopher Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Thorndike v. ThorndikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Njema v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.