Legal Opinion
Mazulis v. Zeldner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1933PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The allegations of the complaint, briefly summarized, were that the plaintiff insured his house through the defendant as insurance broker, the house burned and the defendant brought about a settlement of the loss by the insurer for $2502. The insurance company made two checks aggregating that sum, payable to the plaintiff and lienors on the property insured, and delivered them to the defendant for the plaintiff. The defendant falsely and fraudulently represented to the plaintiff that he could and would repair the fire loss for $1900 and fraudulently induced him to procure the endorsement of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. ChaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Goldberg v. KrayeskeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- O'Hara v. Hartford Oil Heating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- LaBarre v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Ohlin v. KownerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Azzolina v. Order of the Sons of ItalySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Crowell v. Middletown Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Dadio v. DadioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Willamette Management Associates, Inc. v. PalczynskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Masi v. General Ice Cream CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.