Goldberg v. Krayeske

The defendant Krayeske was induced to purchase the property which the plaintiff is seeking to foreclose, by the latter’s fraudulent misrepresenta tions as to the rentals secured from it. He therefore had the right, within the limitations set by law, to have the transaction set aside and to be restored to his original position. Bitondi v. Sheketoff, 91 Conn. 123, 99 Atl. 505; Wilson v. Nichols, 72 Conn. 173, 180, 43 Atl. 1052. One of these limitations is that he must act promptly on discoveiy of the fraud, else he will be deemed to have waived his right to equitable relief; Barnes v. Starr, 64…