Legal Opinion
O'Hara v. Hartford Oil Heating Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff brought this action November 5th, 1925, for a claimed breach by the defendant of a written contract referred to in the complaint as Exhibit A. This contract was dated August 7th, 1925, and provided for the purchase by the plaintiff from the defendant of certain oil-burning automatic heat machines at $365 each.
The finding gives no information as to the provisions of the standard warranty referred to in Exhibit A, though it is set out in full in defendant’s Exhibit 4 of record. It is a material and undisputed fact, and we add it to the finding in compliance with defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vinci v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Lawton v. HerrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Raymond v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Verdi v. DonahueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Goldberg v. KrayeskeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Curran v. KrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Bogaert v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Azzolina v. Order of the Sons of ItalySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Stohlts v. GilkinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Bowen v. MorgilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.