Legal Opinion

Masi v. General Ice Cream Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The jury could reasonably have found from the evidence that on September 28th, 1932, the defendant, a manufacturer of ice cream, owned and occupied a building in Waterbury which contained two floors and a basement, the latter below and the first floor slightly above the street level; within the building an elevator shaft extended from the upper floor to the basement; at the first floor level a platform extended from the front of the building, and access to the elevator from this platform was furnished by a gate which opened into the shaft; this was an electrically operated, slow freight…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Canfield v. SheketoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Schroeder v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Slade v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Skaling v. SheedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Mazulis v. ZeldnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Antonofsky v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Crowell v. Middletown Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Delmore v. PolinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  4. Joanis v. EngstromSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Thibault v. FrechetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API