Legal Opinion

Purdy v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1935No. S. F. 15193PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff sued to recover a trust fund deposit of $7,296.19 applied by the predecessor of the defendant bank under its claim of banker’s lien on a certain promissory note for $14,500 executed by the trustees of the trust property. The plaintiff recovered judgment and the defendant appealed.

Alberto Trescony died testate in 1892. In 1894, pursuant to the provisions of his will, there was distributed to Julius A. Trescony and Robert F. Johnson, as trustees, a one-third interest in certain real property of thé estate consisting of some 45,000 acres of grain land, the same to be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Purdy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Keeney v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Consol. Nat'l Bank v. Pac. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Davis v. Farmers & Merchants BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. First Nat. Bank of Corona v. CoplenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chazen v. Centennial BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Galdjie v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Leach v. Home Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. Barney Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Wen Chang v. Redding Bank of CommerceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API