Legal Opinion
Transport Oil Co. v. Exeter Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 1948No. Civ. 15501PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
,SHINN, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal by Transport Oil Company, herein called Transport, from a judgment denying it damages against Exeter Oil Company, Ltd., herein called Exeter. The action arose as a consequence of Exeter’s abandonment, in January 1942, of a certain oil leasehold located in the Signal Hill oil field at Long Beach, California, and of Exeter’s agreement to operate the property for Transport.
The basic lease to this property was executed in 1921 to one Stutts as lessee. It required the lessee to do certain drilling on the property, which has been done, and to pay a 16% per cent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Moore v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Walden v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Union Gas & Oil Co. v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Denker v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Paulus v. Beck Energy Corp., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Monroe County2017
- Reese Enterprises, Inc. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.