Legal Opinion
Finley v. Trent
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided February 28, 1997No. Civil Action 2:94cv132PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MAXWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se in the above-styled civil rights action, seeks to pursue his remedies in this Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 On November 20, 1995, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, a Motion for Summary Judgment, which the Court has determined will be construed as a Motion for Summary Judgment and considered pursu ant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In their Motion for Summary Judgment, the defendants argue that (1) the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Singletary v. Sterling Transport Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- HDSherer LLC v. Natural Molecular Testing Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
- Sherrill v. Dio Transport, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
- Krell v. BraightmeyerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Mobilization Funding II, LLC v. Jessup Construction, LLC, Anthony Setliff, Kimberly Setliff, Barbara Stokes, Scott Stokes, GSH of Alabama, LLC; GSH of Alabama, LLC, Barbara Stokes, Scott Stokes v. Mobilization Funding II, LLC, Jessup Construction, LLC, Anthony Setliff, Kimberly Setliff; GSH of Alabama, LLC, Barbara Stokes, Scott Stokes v. Talem Capital, LLC, Brandon Bey, Scott Peper, and Does 1 Through 20District Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.