Charles L. Kirby v. Stanley Blackledge, Warden of Central Prison, and v. Lee Bounds, Commissioner of the North Carolina Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice CLARK:
While federal courts are most reluctant to interfere in the administration of state or federal prison systems, it becomes necessary to do so where constitutionally secured rights of prisoners are abridged by prison officials without compelling justification. We have such a case here.
This § 1983 action was brought by prisoners incarcerated in the maximum security section of North Carolina Central Prison at Raleigh — known as I & J cell blocks. In the complaint, it is alleged that the informal hearing procedures used to assign prisoners to these units violate the Due Process…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- John McCann Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. T. Coughlin, Iii, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Chester Patterson v. Barry MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Laaman v. HelgemoeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1977
- Del Raine v. WillifordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.